False Prophecy of St. Malachy & 112 Popes

For the idols have spoken vanity, and the diviners have seen a lie, and have told false dreams;.... Zechariah 10:2

"The Prophecy of the Popes is a list of 112 cryptic Latin phrases attributed to Saint Malachy, a 12th-century Archbishop of Armagh, who supposedly had a vision of all future popes during a visit to Rome in 1139.

The prophecy was first published in 1595 by Benedictine monk Arnold Wion in his book Lignum Vitae, more than 400 years after Malachy’s death. There is no historical record of the prophecy existing during the intervening centuries, which casts serious doubt on its authenticity. 

***Pre-1590 Accuracy vs. Post-1590 Vagueness: The mottos for popes before 1590 align closely with historical facts, but those for popes after 1590 are often vague, ambiguous, or forced to fit events retrospectively. 

***Lack of Original Manuscripts: Scholars have never located an original manuscript from Malachy’s time, and the prophecy only appears in print centuries later. 

***The Catholic Church has never officially endorsed the prophecy, and it is not considered an approved private revelation." 

CS

Why 536 A.D. instead of 538 A.D.?

Since the 1260 days (years) prophecy began in 538 A.D. of Papal supremacy, then why would 536 A.D. be the worst year to be alive
due to natural disasters?

Well the edict that placed the Pope as head of all Christendom was issued in 536 A.D. by Emperor Justinian. 

But the Pope was held up for over 2 years in Rome trapped by the Ostrogoths.

It was not until 538 A.D. that General Belisarius relieved the siege of Rome and informed the Pope of his new status and gave him the edict.

Q: So was all this that befell the earth in 536 A.D. a sign from God of the DARKNESS about to befall the earth or just a coincidence?
And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. Daniel 7:25

"In the year 536, daylight itself went away.
Across Europe, the Middle East and parts of Asia, people looked up and saw a sun that gave little warmth and cast a strange, weak light. Summer brought snow in China. Crops failed virtually everywhere, spreading hunger worse than any plague. Then, only a few years

later, an actual plague arrived to top things off. We know from written sources that there were serious drops in temperature, both in Europe and in China. For historians and climate scientists, 536 has become a leading candidate for the worst year to be alive.
The fabled year 536 AD was in the middle of a literal Dark Age.

Byzantine historian Procopius, writing from Constantinople, described the world around the year 536 in which “the sun gave forth its light without brightness, like the moon, during the whole year.” The Roman statesman Cassiodorus later wrote that “the sun seems to have lost its wonted light and appears a bluish color.”

Irish chronicles recorded “a failure of bread” from the years 536–539.

“There’s a kind of feedback loop in the problems … Once you get one sort of catastrophe in the pre-modern world, it often leads to other

ones,” Dr. Pattenden said.

Then came the plague.
The damage was enormous and the economy across Europe and large parts of Asia was likely in a ruinous state.
“To put it in some perspective, if you were a carefree 18-year-old in the summer of 535, you’d probably have to live between 80 and 100 years to get back to conditions that were similar to what you’d remember from being a child,” said Pattenden." 

ZMEScience

Luke's Detailed History

Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene, Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.

Luke 3:1,2

The debate over the AD 31 date for the crucifixion, and therefore for dates of the prophetic timeline in Daniel's prophecies, is solid. 

Add 3 and half years of Christ's ministry following His baptism in AD 27 you end up in D 31. 

"Tiberius came to the throne in 12 AD. 

He was a co-ruler with Augustus Caesar from 12 AD. So if you add

15 years to 12, you get AD 27 as and this chapter here is dealing with the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist.

But if you happen to be living in Judea, this happened when Pontius Pilate was the governor of Judea. 

And if you happen to be living in in um Galilee, it's when Herod was the tetrarch.
Philillip was the tetrarch  over the river Jordan and Trachonitis. 

And if you happen living in the Abalene area is when Lysanius was the tetrarch there. 

And it's when Annus and Caiaphas were high priests and the word of God came to John son of Zacharas. 

If you're in the Levitical families you will have known when this happened as well. 

So Luke is giving us all these historical characters. 

So if you're a Roman in Rome, if you are living in Galilee, if you're living in Judea, if you're living beyond the Jordan, if you're living in
Jerusalem, and if you're in the Levitical families, you have a point of reference in these two verses. 

What Luke is making sure is that nobody can dispute that Jesus of Nazareth was baptized in AD 27. That's the point of all this history." 

Conrad Vine

Branham & Bell: Servants of Satan on Racism [Serpent Seed & Interest Convergence Hypothesis]

 Serpent Seed:

"The serpent seed theory refers to a false teaching that unnecessarily links the incident between Eve and the serpent (Satan) in Genesis to sexual relations. This teaching states that Eve had sexual relations with the serpent and from that Cain was born. Therefore, Cain and his descendants are considered descendants of Satan.

However, this doctrine is not in harmony with the teachings of the Bible. The serpent’s seed doctrine is a mixture of racial discrimination, prejudice, and religious superstition, which attempts to identify certain races or groups as the offspring of Satan.

Branham (1909–65), a proponent of Oneness theology, taught the so-called serpent seed.

“Here is what really happened in the Garden of Eden. The Word says that Eve was beguiled by the serpent. She was actually seduced by the serpent….He was so close to being human that his seed could, and did mingle with that of the woman and cause her to conceive. When this happened, God cursed the serpent.”

— William Branham

**As early as the mid-1940s, Identity preachers were building a new doctrine: the Serpent Seed theory. It is a fairly simple and straightforward belief: Jews are the physical descendants of a sexual union between ‘Mother Eve’ and ‘the serpent’ (Gen. 3). The serpent is variously identified as either Satan, or a demonic representative of Satan. As such, Jews are literally ‘Children of the Devil.’

William Branham taught the Christian Identity doctrines of Wesley A. Swift. According to this doctrine, the Serpent from the Garden of Eden mated with Eve to produce the black race.
William Branham's repeated use of racial language alongside terms like "darkie," reflected the racial assumptions of the white supremacist world that shaped his ministry, especially through his mentor Roy E. Davis and his continued ties to Klan-connected

figures; although Branham claimed to have repented of personal hatred toward Black people, his Serpent's Seed and "hybreeding" doctrines carried forward Christian Identity ideas associated with Wesley Swift, teaching racial impurity, condemning interracial marriage, and allowing later Message figures to identify Black people with the serpent's alleged evil bloodline, even as modern defenders attempt to soften or obscure the racial meaning of those teachings.
Branham re-branded Swift's doctrine and sold it to the masses under the name "Serpent's Seed", carefully separating the racial implications from Swift's doctrine into his own "hybreeding" doctrine. According to the "hybreeding" doctrine, the black race was impure, "mongrel",and should not mix with the white race. The "Curse of Ham", which described the "evil" through time due to the "colored people"."
GG/CR

Interest Convergence Hypothesis:
"If you're not familiar with critical race theory, it was developed by the first African-American tenure law professor at Harvard called Derek Bell. And there are various aspects of critical race theory.
One of which divides the world into oppressors and oppressed, which is the cultural Marxist worldview. 

You have the concept of intersectionality.....so that you're oppressed along multiple planes of existence. So if you are for instance black, female and gay and handicapped you're you're you're discriminated against in four bases in society that's what intersectionality is. 

But professor Derek Bell his unique contribution to critical race

theory was something called the interest convergence hypothesis. And the interest convergence hypothesis says this: White people are so intrinsically evil that even if a white person, does something to ostensibly help the plight of black people in America, that white person is never actually acting to benefit black people in America, they're acting to to perpetuate white supremacy and the subjugation of the black people.... what this means is that white people are intrinsically and for forever will be evil. 

**The logical conclusion of of this kind of ideology is not just segregation. It's the elimination of the problem race, which is genocide." 

Conrad Vine

REBUTTAL:
The Bible clearly shows that all people come from one source (And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the

face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; Acts 17:26), and salvation is open to all. 

Paul taught that “sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men” (Romans 5:12). 

He reinforced this by stating that “in Adam all die,” (1 Corinthians 15:22).

When Tesla dabbled in Romans 1:30 (Spirit Radio)

...inventors of evil things,.... 

Romans 1:30

"The spiritualist movement, which gained significant popularity during the 1800s, proposed that the souls of the deceased could communicate with the living through mediums or various devices. This period saw an explosion of spiritualist activity, with séances, ghostly apparitions, and attempts to contact the afterlife becoming mainstream.

Tesla, ever the visionary, was no stranger to the cultural currents of

his time. His scientific innovations, such as his work with electricity and wireless transmission, had already shown the world that unseen forces could be harnessed and manipulated in ways that were previously unimaginable. It is within this context that Tesla’s “spirit radio” emerged, blending his cutting-edge scientific research with the popular beliefs of the era in the supernatural.

In the early 1900s, Tesla began to theorize that his advancements in wireless technology could be used for more than just practical purposes like remote control or communication. Tesla’s deep fascination with the nature of energy and vibrations led him to believe that the transmission of electromagnetic waves could extend beyond physical boundaries. He theorized that certain frequencies or vibrations might allow a person to tap into a plane of existence beyond the physical world — the realm of spirits or the afterlife.
Tesla’s speculation regarding the “spirit radio” appears to have been prompted by his ongoing experiments with resonance and wireless energy.

Tesla’s “spirit radio” was, in essence, an early form of a device designed to detect signals that he believed could be the “voices” of spirits. Tesla made several public claims regarding the device, hinting that it could amplify or tune into specific frequencies that would allow users to connect with the dead.

For Tesla, the human body, the earth,

 and even the cosmos were interconnected 

through a vast web of energy.

At the same time, Tesla’s interest in the paranormal could have been influenced by the wave of spiritualist activity that was sweeping across Europe and America during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Tesla’s experiments with the “spirit radio” were never fully realized or documented in a concrete manner. There is no record of a finished, functioning device that allowed communication with spirits. However, Tesla made a few cryptic remarks about the device, which were largely interpreted by the media and the public as a serious claim to have created a machine capable of such communication.
According to various reports, Tesla’s “spirit radio” would have likely involved a receiver capable of picking up electromagnetic signals, potentially allowing for the detection of what he referred to as “voices from the beyond.” 

Tesla claimed that during his experiments, he had been able to hear faint sounds or signals that he believed were the result of spiritual entities reaching out. However, given the ambiguous nature of Tesla’s statements, it is difficult to know whether he was simply describing unexplained phenomena or suggesting a truly metaphysical mechanism at work.
After tinkering with a crystal radio powered by electromagnetic waves, Tesla found that strange an unexplained voices emerged. He wrote in his diary:

"The sounds I am listening to every night at first appear to be human voices conversing back and forth in a language I cannot understand."

He was initially convinced that the voices were inexplicable, perhaps

supernatural.
Tesla gave to The New York Times in 1922.... claiming that scientific advancements in wireless technology could be the key to “intercommunicating with other worlds.”
“My first observations positively terrified me as there was present in them something mysterious, not to say supernatural, and I was alone in my laboratory at night”
– Nikola Tesla, 1901 article “Talking With The Planets."
MSP/BBC

When Thomas Edison dabbled in Romans 1:30 (Spirit Phone)

.....inventors of evil things,... 

Romans 1:31

"In the pantheon of Thomas Edison’s inventions, few are as enigmatic—or as controversial—as his so-called “spirit phone.” The fabled device, rumored to connect the living with the dead.
Known as “The Wizard of Menlo Park,” he was the mastermind behind the phonograph, the electric light bulb, and numerous other groundbreaking inventions.

But in the 1920s, Edison reportedly turned his attention to something far stranger: a device he believed could communicate with the dead. This so-called “spirit phone,” however, remains shrouded in mystery and intrigue, offering a tantalizing glimpse into Edison’s lifelong fascination with the unknown.

Edison was a scientist to his core, but he was also a businessman and, perhaps unexpectedly, a spiritual seeker.
Edison was one of several ostensibly intelligent people who got caught up in the turn-of-the-century religious fad known as spiritualism.
The movement attracted tons of people we consider to be pretty smart, from scientists and Nobel Prize Winners like Pierre Curie (husband of Marie Curie) to famous authors like Charles Dickens and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle..... the religion saw a boost in popularity after World War I. Lots of people had lost loved ones and they were desperate to be able to speak with them one last time. In the face of such widespread grief, a wave of quacks posing as mediums swept through the United States and elsewhere, claiming they could conduct séances to put people in contact with the ghosts of their loved ones.

As Halloween in 1920 quickly approached, Thomas Edison had quite the “treat” to share with the public. In an October 16, 1920, interview published in The American Magazine with Bertie Charles Forbes, the founder of Forbes magazine, Edison boldly revealed,

“I have been at work for some time, building an apparatus to see if it is possible for personalities which have left this earth to communicate with us. There are two or three kinds of apparatus which should make communication very easy. I am engaged in the construction of one such apparatus now, and I hope to be able to finish it before very many months pass.”

This so-called “spirit phone” would not involve ghostly apparitions or the theatrics of a séance. Instead, Edison speculated that if the human spirit persisted after death, it might exist as “subtle particles” capable of affecting the physical world, albeit on a microscopic level.
In his diary, Edison theorized that life, like matter and energy, was indestructible. He envisioned tiny life-based particles continuing to exist after death, forming a personality-based residue—memories, thoughts, and impressions that once defined a person. 

If these particles persisted, Edison speculated, they might gather around us within the space-time continuum, or what he called the “ether.”
Edison believed these particles might produce vibrations detectable by sensitive instruments—a scientific approach that he thought could bypass the subjectivity and unreliability of mediums and psychics.
He envisioned the “spirit phone” working like a finely tuned electrical device, capable of detecting the subtle “etheric” forces that supposedly linger after death.

By the time of his death in 1931, no one had publicly demonstrated a working device, and the project seemed to fade into obscurity. Yet the idea refused to die. In later decades, researchers in electronic voice phenomena and instrumental transcommunication would point back to Edison as a kind of intellectual predecessor, someone who had

envisioned a scientific bridge between the living and the dead long before technology could even begin to approach such a possibility.
Edison died in 1931, and his posthumous memoir The Diary and Sundry Observations of Thomas Alva Edison was published in 1948. According to Tech Times, the final chapter of that book included the inventor's designs for a "spirit phone." 

That chapter, however, was never published in English. It had been removed from the original text before publication, and in its absence scholars and scientists believed Edison's statements about making tech to talk to ghosts were simply his odd way of making a joke or trying to pull a fast one on the public.
But that chapter wasn't removed from the book entirely. It was never edited out of the French translation, and in 2015, Edison's true beliefs about the next plane of existence were brought to the attention of French readers via a book titled Le Royaume de l'Au-dela (The Kingdom of the Afterlife). 

Radio personality and philosopher Philippe Baudouin, who wrote the preface to the book, said that Edison made a deal with an audio engineer named William Walter Dinwiddie in which the first of the two to die "would try to send a message to the survivor from beyond." Baudouin said that the chapter reveals that Edison "imagined being able to record the voice of another being, to be able to make audible that which isn't — the voice of the dead."
TheDebrief/PanicD

Among the MOST "damnable heresies" of the New Age & Alice Bailey

 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, .... 2 Peter 2:1

The founder of the New Age movement, Alice Bailey, taught that Christ was just the head of wise masters. Of all the New Age

A "Damnable" Heresy

teachings and heresies, from astrology to pantheism, the MOST "DAMNABLE" would be the teaching that Christ isn't "God" but rather an enlightened master. 

Their "god" she refers to is the cosmos and Christ leads the wise masters (which by this Bailey means those who stopped reincarnating among us due to achieving mystical wisdom and reside on a planet to communicate with us this wisdom to those seek it via meditation). Other wise masters nearly on par with Christ are the Buddha and Krishna.

"In the past the keynote of the Christian religion has been death symbolized for us in the death of Christ, and much distorted by Saint Paul in his effort to blend the new religion which Christ brought with the old blood religion of the Jews. 
In the cycle which Christ will inaugurate after his reappearance, the goal of all the religious teaching in the world will be the resurrection of the Spirit in mankind. The emphasis will be upon the livingness of the Christ nature in every human being and upon the
use of the will in bringing about this living transition of the lower nature, the proof of it will be the risen Christ.
This way of resurrection is the radiant way all faiths can say, with Sri Krishna speaking as God the creator, that having pervaded the whole universe with a fragment of myself, I remain this god transcendent has dominated the religious thinking of millions of simple and spiritually minded people down the ages which have elapsed since humanity began to press forward towards Divinity. Slowly there is dawning upon the awakening consciousness of humanity, the great paralleling

truth of God imminent, divinely pervading all
truth of God imminent, divinely pervading all forms, conditioning from within all kingdoms in nature, expressing innate divinity through human beings, and 2000 years ago portraying the nature of the Divine imminence in the Person of the Christ.

Christ is in us as He was in the Master Jesus, and this belief will alter world affairs and mankind's entire attitude to life.

The Masters of the Wisdom and all those liberated sons of God who down the ages have passed from darkness to light, from the unreal to the real, and from death to immortality, they stand ready to carry out His bidding and to obey Him.

The words he spoke were few and simple, and all men can understand them, but their significance has been largely lost in the intricate legalities and discussions of Saint Paul.
Around Him, in that high place on earth, where He is His abiding place, are gathered today all his great disciples. 
His guidance to reveal to all those who today struggle in the maelstrom of world affairs and who seek to solve the world.
The Buddha himself is standing behind the Christ in humble recognition of the divine task which He is on the verge of consummating."

Alice Bailey (founder of New Age)

On Race: God vs. Blavatsky, Darwin and the Nazi's

Madam Blavatsky, (founder of Theosophy) was the influencer of the New Age movement of Alice Bailey, (herself an anti-semite) one of her followers who split off in the early 20th century.
One can see from the writings of Blavatsky below, that she was a full blown racist in her thinking borrowing from Darwin's teaching of his book "Origin of the Species and the Preservation of the Favored Races" (the full title of his book).
She admitted to being influenced by 4 ideas: Buddhism, Hinduism, Darwin and the Occult (which she cast as the "science" of spirituality).
Her belief, as seen below, blended with her 7 root races theory, (of which the current is the Aryan race) gave birth in the early 20th century in Europe to Ariosiophy (Blavatsky claimed that the current 5th root race is the Aryan) believing that the Aryans are at the top of the evolutionary chain. It was adopted wholeheartedly by a small band of socialist workers in Germany who became known to history as the NAZI Party.
She admitted to being influenced by 4 ideas: Buddhism, Hinduism, Darwin and the Occult (which she cast as the "science" of spirituality).
Her belief, as seen below, blended with her 7 root races theory, (of which the current is the Aryan race) gave birth in the early 20th century in Europe to Ariosiophy (Blavatsky claimed that the current 5th root race is the Aryan) believing that the Aryans are at the top of the evolutionary chain. It was adopted wholeheartedly by a small band of socialist workers in Germany who became known to history as the NAZI Party.

In her Footnote on page 421 of the Secret Doctrine vol 2 mankind is obviously divided into "formed men and lower human creatures the intellectual difference between the Aryan and other civilized nations and such savages as the South Sea Islanders is inexplicable on any
other grounds no amount of culture nor generations of training and civilization training a mid civilization could raise such human specimens as the other grounds no amount of culture nor generations of training and civilization training a mid civilization could raise such human specimens as the Bushmen the Vedas of Ceylon and some African tribes to the same intellectual level as the Aryans the Semites and the Turanians so-called."

"The sacred spark is missing in them and it is they who are the only inferior races on the globe now happily owing to the wise adjustment of nature whichever works in that direction fast dying out verily mankind is "of one blood" but not of the same essence we are the hothouse artificially quickened plants in nature having in us a spark which in them is latent." 

Madam Blavatsky

Q: When was that "sacred spark" actually imparted?

A: At the creation when He breathed into mankind the spark of life.

***But God says And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.---Not some men....

Genesis 2:7
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
Acts 17:26

A counterfeit "Cleansing of the Sanctuary " by the New Age on earth

Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them;
Deuteronomy 11:16

The New Age set up a counterfeit to the Cleansing of the Sanctuary in heaven with a supposed "cleansing" by the so-called "Mother Earth". Instead of Christ purging the sins of men on earth in the heavenly Sanctuary the so-called "Mother Earth" does a cleansing down here of sins against her.....The Climate Change CULT is steeped in New Age Mysticism.

"In a 1994 article titled The time is now, K. Wheeler claims to have channeled entities that called themselves the souls of light.
According to her, they say that the mother is cleansing the earth of the pollution that exists within her body.
She continues saying that you as light bearers can help your mother cleanse it so that she does not have to destroy all life on this planet. These disembodied souls of light tell us that mother says earth's population needs to be decreased to bring forth the necessary

changes upon this planet.
As Wheeler explains it, it will be a time of great rejoicing for them. There will be no reason to feel sad about their leaving. She continues, "Since they are going home, they must move on, for their thought patterns are of the past, which keeps Earth held back."
Using Orwellian news speak we are told that many will be leaving this planet because they have served their purpose.
As I have stated elsewhere, this sort of Alice Baileyesque cleansing action in which many will be forced to leave the planet sounds like the euphemistic release to elsewhere spoken of in Lois Lowry's 1993
novel, The Giver.
Similarly, in her revelations of things to come 1982, Earlene Chaney says that she channels a being who says that mother earth demands that there be a cleansing of dark thought forces in her Bringers of the Dawn teaching from the Pleidians 1992.
Barbara Marciniak likewise says that if human beings do not change, there will be a cleansing. She tells us it will be the removal of a great number of souls.
According to her, these people do not fit in here any longer and they are stopping the harmony of Earth. Marciniak says there will be perhaps 20 million people that will leave the planet at one time." MMChurch

Transcendentalism: Ralph Waldo Emmerson & Hindu Influence

Wherefore come out from among them,

and be ye separate, saith the Lord,

and touch not the unclean thing;

2 Corinthians 6:17

"Ralph Waldo Emerson may be regarded as the founding father of New Thought.
He was much influenced by his reading of the Hindu scriptures. 

He wrote: "In all nations there are minds which incline to dwell in the conception of the fundamental Unity. This tendency finds its highest expression in the religious writings of the East, and chiefly in the Indian Scriptures, in the Vedas, the Bhagavat-Gita, and the Vishnu Purana. . . . I owed a magnificent day to the Bhagavat-Gita. It was the first of books; it was as if an empire spoke to us, nothing small or unworthy, but large, serene, consistent, the voice of an old intelligence which in another age and climate had pondered and thus disposed of the same questions which exercise us".


Emerson delivered a lecture on “The Oversoul,” at the Harvard

Divinity School in 1844. He talked of a ‘divine presence’ that permeates the whole creation and all living things.
The close parallel between Hindu scripture and Emerson’s
enunciation here is unmistakable.
Emerson was settled in Concord, Massachusetts, which now boasts an impressive Emerson Museum. Leading Transcendentalists in Massachusetts included Henry David Thoreau, Phineas Quimby, Margaret Fuller, Palmer Peabody, James Freeman Clark, and Mary Baker Eddy. Charles and Myrtle Fillmore founded the Unity Church in 1889 with headquarters in Missouri."
UniversityOfWestFlorida

Who was Hitler's "god"?

 Thou shalt have no other gods before Me. Exodus 20:3

"Hitler uses the word “Providence” for God over 500 times in hisspeeches, and invokes the “Almighty”.
....they had a ‘race pope’ (Hans Günter), who wrote about the ‘Nordic Race’; they wanted to purify the ‘blood’, by which they meant ‘spirit’ or the soul (the blood is the spirit, and the spirit is the blood);
Q: But the answer to one question eluded us: which specific God did Hitler worship?

A: Well, it turns out that all we had to do was go back to the origins

of the National Socialist movement to find our answer.
Q: But the answer to one question eluded us: which specific God did Hitler worship?

A: Well, it turns out that all we had to do was go back to the origins of the National Socialist movement to find our answer. Rudolf Jung was the first National Socialist to write a book on the movement, publishing it in 1919 - six years before Mein Kampf.
Rudolf Jung not only outlines the very early history of the National Socialist movement, but he also straight-up tells us which God they worshipped.

“Let us quietly leave the desert god Yahweh, that spirit of destruction, to the Jews; ours is called the All-Father!”

I cannot emphasize how important this sentence is.
But who is the “All-Father”? Well, it’s Odin.

“Odin – the one-eyed All-Father. Odin has many names and is the god of both war and death.”

Let’s just first understand who Odin was:

“[As] dramatically retold in the [Eddaic] poem The Song of the High One (Havamal), [Odin] "sacrificed himself to himself" by hanging from the great tree at the center of the cosmos for nine days and nights, foregoing all food and water and peering relentlessly downward into the dark waters of the Well of Fate below, until at last he obtained the object of his ordeal.”

...Odin was willing to undergo any trial in order to gain more knowledge of the innermost workings of the universe. (That’s probably gnosticism.)
And Odin was also the God of death:

“One of his particular magical specialities was necromancy… During earlier times, the Roman writers even identified him with Mercury, the Roman god who ferried the spirits of the newly dead to the underworld, rather than Mars, the god of war.”

Odin is, therefore, primarily the God of death, but also of war. And the Swastika is associated with him. Now, I’ve said before that I couldn’t understand why they chose the right-handed version of the Swastika, rather than the left-handed version. 

This was a mystery --- Well, now that we know it’s Odin (the God of war and death), it makes perfect sense.
In May 1919 Krohn wrote a memorandum [...] in which he proposed the left-handed swastika (i.e. clockwise in common with those of the theosophists and the Germanenorden) as the symbol of the DAP. He evidently preferred the sign in this direction on account of its Buddhistical interpretation as a talisman of fortune and health,
whereas its right-handed (i.e. anti-clockwise) counterpart betokened decline and death.

Hitler insisted that the National Socialist Swastika be right-handed,

which would symbolize ‘decline and death’. Odin is the God of death, and Rudolf Jung confirms that the National Socialist God is Odin. So it makes perfect sense why Hitler chose the right-handed version of the Swastika: it represented his God. The Swastika is Odin’s symbol.

Jost Turner and his NS Kindred, which celebrates Odin as a master of mysteries in a devotional cult of Aryan mysticism with meditation and yoga;

Odin is associated with war, and boasts in one Eddic poem: “I incited the princes never to make peace”... which could go some way to explaining why Hitler never made peace either.

Jung coined the slogan "Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz" (common good comes before self-interest). This would become a central tenet of Nazi ideology."

TIKhistory

The spirit behind Marx

 Wherefore by their fruits 

ye shall know them. 

Matthew 7:20

Q: What was the fruit of Marx?
A: Nearly 100,000,000 body bags filled globally the last century.

"Robert Payne was a British academic .... he did a couple did several works on Marx late 60s early 1970s....was really the first one to mine Marx's poetry and it's deeply disturbing stuff--it a lot of it is about the devil-- quite literally about the devil it's chilling:

"Heaven I forfeited I Know It full well my heart once true to God is chosen for hell."....straight Lucifer from from Milton 1837 and it was
1841 and here he puts himself it appears in the form of this kind of

mad violinist who's like frenetically maniacally sawing away at the violin and he's summoning up the powers of Darkness and he's doing this in front of his love interest and the love interest yeah right and the love interest.

Robert Payne says appears to be his girl at the time Jenny the girl that he would that he would end up marrying and he's summoning up the powers of darkness and she's saying why are you doing this to him it's here's he stands up and tells the girl:

"Look now my blood Dark

Sword shall stab unerringly within thy Soul 

the hellish Vapors rise and fill the brain 

till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed 

see the sword the Prince of Darkness sold it to me 

for he beats the time and gives the signs

 ever more boldly I play the dance of death."

Robert Payne says picture Marx standing there in the middle of a burned down Village, burnt down house, building and Flames all around him you know everything that exists deserves to perish and as if to say now we can begin right he wants to take everything.

The Communist may be summed up in the single sentence abolition of private property --- so that's gone, in the manifesto they write abolition of the family exclamation mark even the most radical flare up of this Infamous proposal of the Communists.

Marx of the six kids he and Jenny had four of them died before they did. 

*Then the two girls that survived both committed suicide in suicide packs with their husbands and by drinking poison and as you noticed in the Marx's poetry a recurring theme in all of his poetry is about the couples coming together the one the pale Maiden which sounds like a late night be movie horror flick. 

This pale Maiden drinks Hemlock she commits suicide -- lovers committing suicide and suicide packs. That's how Marx's two daughters died.

The Communist Manifesto is kind of a Diatribe. 

There's a lot of anger in there.
The only part of the end of the Communist Manifesto anybody
remembers is "workers of the world unite".

But if you just go back one paragraph at the end right the Communists support every revolutionary movement and the forcible overthrow of all existing conditions.

Marx was obsessed with these ideas of conjuring up the underworld despite his professed atheism .... by the way even the phrase "each according to his ability to according to his needs" that's a twisting of the scripture of the New Testament.

Alinsky in the intro to Rules for Radicals lest we forget at least an over the shoulder acknowledgement to that first of all Rebels who won himself his own kingdom ....you don't walk by that sort of statement accidentally. 

These are the same people who think that Milton's Lucifer is a hero and give their magazines names like the Jacobin. 

Q: Why would you name your magazine after a group that guillotined 40,000 people in France in 1793 and 1794?

Lucifer is an usurper. He's the spirit that wants to overthrow everything and put himself at the top.

Dr. Bruno Bauer, University of Bonn, he was a professor of theology who was an atheist...he's eventually run out of the University but he and Marx became very tight....for Palm Sunday they rode in on donkeys together kind of mocking the entrance of Christ into Jerusalem . 

They would go into churches together he and Bruno Bauer and laugh and kind of make noise in the Pew just to be disrespectful. 

So he's angry and throughout his life no one liked him.

War I and World War II combined so that ideology was pretty hellacious to say the least. It's very naive not to assume that the events that we described in Marx's life are not connected to his economic policies. ... calling on Dark Forces obviously so because otherwise they wouldn't have compelled people in that manner especially not toward the that sort of immense sadistic murderousness and utter destructiveness and of course get to the

hatred of God which all the Communists did so all the Communists thereafter seek to ban religion. They're not exactly atheists because they're trying to stomp something out. It's not just a neutrality. 

It is militant aggressive atheism. Trotsky and Lenin create the league of the militant Godless. They ban religion, they have the Moscow Church trials, they blow up churches, they jail priests. 

Lenin said all worship of a Divinity is a necrophilia. There is nothing more abominable than religion so they don't just try to stop religion.

What the Communists did to the religious Enterprise is evidence of something far more militant than a mere atheism.

Analyzing the history of Stalinist Soviet Union including the Leninist
period what you see fundamentally is a celebration of sadistic Devastation that's the fundamental goal -- the flag waving about the new Utopia that's going to be created.

Christ says them man does not live on bread alone but the Marxists actually acts as if man does live on bread precisely. They believe that if you solve the economic problem if you solve the class problem." 

Krangor

Refuting Hitler

 "In recent weeks, AI-generated translations of Hitler’s speeches have

gone viral, reaching millions around the world.
People are hearing Hitler’s words in their own language for the first time.
The National Socialists, racists and Social Darwinists, treat us like cattle, or breeds of dogs.
And the idea of ‘race’ itself is a social idea - it comes from Social Darwinism.

The policy wasn’t “privatization”; it was “Gleichschaltung” - forced synchronization, which is a nationalization of all businesses and social groups. 

Heavy social regulations impacted every industry, price controls were imposed on every good and service, there was a central

distribution of goods, and central planning boards for coal, textiles, timber, batteries, paper and steel - amongst many others. The beekeeping and bowling clubs, the canary breeders and the stamp collectors, the youth organizations, the yacht clubs, the media, the economy, the schools, the trade unions, the police - everything was synchronized with the state, nationalized by the state, socialized by the state.

What the National Socialists do is deny our humanity - 

deny our ability to think. 

Yes, you might be born into a certain family that has held certain beliefs, and you might even have grown up to embrace those beliefs. 

But the fact you have a brain, and the fact that you could use that

brain to grow and learn, means that you have the potential to change those beliefs. (I’m not saying you ‘should’ change those beliefs, but that you ‘could’ if those beliefs turned out to be wrong.) 

And so, yes, you ‘could’ fall into a certain belief system, or a certain culture, a religion, or ideology… but that doesn’t mean you will necessarily stay there.
Therefore, saying that someone is pre-determined to act in a certain way because they came from a certain background, nation, race, gender or whatever, isn’t correct because it denies the one thing that makes us human - our minds. 

National Socialists deny our humanity and lower us to the level of dogs and cattle. And so, if you are human, and if you use your brain, then you are not a breed of dog, you are not a type of cattle, and you are not your skin color. 

(So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; ... Genesis 1:27)

You are not an animal, you are not a race - 

you are a human, 

and therefore, 

an individual." 

TIKhistory